<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1 pound of muscle burns 50 calories per day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/</link>
	<description>Diet Nutrition Exercise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbarban</title>
		<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/#comment-2594</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbarban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbarban.com/?p=784#comment-2594</guid>
		<description>Elie,

Great insight and I&#039;ll bet your right on the money.

JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elie,</p>
<p>Great insight and I&#8217;ll bet your right on the money.</p>
<p>JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elie</title>
		<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Elie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbarban.com/?p=784#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>The 50 Kcal / lb muscle value was probably falsely derived from the Katch-Mcardle formula: 370 + (21.6 X lean mass in kg)

Probably some &quot;experts&quot; assumed that all lean mass is muscles and did an arithmetic errpr by multiplying 21.6 x 2.2 instead of dividing it, yielding 47.5 Kcals.

Funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 50 Kcal / lb muscle value was probably falsely derived from the Katch-Mcardle formula: 370 + (21.6 X lean mass in kg)</p>
<p>Probably some &#8220;experts&#8221; assumed that all lean mass is muscles and did an arithmetic errpr by multiplying 21.6 x 2.2 instead of dividing it, yielding 47.5 Kcals.</p>
<p>Funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R</title>
		<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbarban.com/?p=784#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>Ha!  Finally someone asked the question!  I was wondering the same thing, it seemed like you were doing wind sprints during the filming.  You should have recorded the workout sets as well so we could critique you!!

BTW, I&#039;m perfect so far on my quiz score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  Finally someone asked the question!  I was wondering the same thing, it seemed like you were doing wind sprints during the filming.  You should have recorded the workout sets as well so we could critique you!!</p>
<p>BTW, I&#8217;m perfect so far on my quiz score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnbarban</title>
		<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>johnbarban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbarban.com/?p=784#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>Lars,

Any extra calorie burning would be a result of simply being a heavier person and carrying around more weight. So yes there would be a linear correlation, but it wouldn&#039;t amount to very much. 

JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lars,</p>
<p>Any extra calorie burning would be a result of simply being a heavier person and carrying around more weight. So yes there would be a linear correlation, but it wouldn&#8217;t amount to very much. </p>
<p>JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://johnbarban.com/1-pound-of-muscle-burns-50-calories-per-day/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnbarban.com/?p=784#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>If you run with more muscle mass in your legs, does amount of calories burned increase in a positive linear fashion with amount of mass added?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you run with more muscle mass in your legs, does amount of calories burned increase in a positive linear fashion with amount of mass added?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

